The People Representing the Reality?

I'm reading the article by Göran Hägglund on DN Debatt. I'm thinking about how the Alliansen is going to get their required votes to regain command in one year. KD is not an entryport for Red-Greens as Hägglund is pointing out. Nya Moderaterna can pick a few and have recently tried. So can Folkpartiet. Thus KD has to take back votes from M if Alliansen is to succeed.

Well, the people Hägglund talks about are probably voters in M because he talkes about the silent majority like Nixon. And if this crowd exists today it is in the largest party. So why is Hägglund trying to make Social Democrats enter M and FP rather than bringing back M defectants?

I think it might be because they don't want to discuss the issue of modern Swedish family structure. I could not help laughing when I read about Anna Anka on aftonbladet.se. It is of course a caricature of the KD core family. A paradigm that currently is quite alien in Sweden. The right wing parties are rather modeled on the Reinfeldt family. Two professional individuals that are "levnadskamrater". The family values that KD stands for are probably getting rarer by the year and clearly alienates the Red-Green block.

Is it possible then for KD to regain lost M votes? M has supposedly left a vacuum to the right of its position. Or so they say. I'm afraid that it is indeed a vacuum and cannot be filled again even if Roland Poirier Martinson says so. There are very few Swedish American Republicans in this cradle-to-the-grave country.